THE HOLISTIC COSMOLOGY
Let this be said at once: I'm NOT
impressed by several hypothesis and theories of the modern science
of Astrophysics or Cosmology. Partly because they creates more
questions than answers and partly they creates a diversity of
anomalies because of the lack of understanding the most obviously
and observable natural laws.
And, when not understanding
the direct observable natural laws, the
scientists just adds some further speculative equations or mentally installs some "anti"-
elements in order to "make the damn thing to react as expected"
regarding to some "laws of nature" that NEVER complied from the very
moment they first was stated as general cosmological "scientific
New ideas and and a new
Cosmological, Natural and Universal explanation are very much
needed! So here it is:
RHYTHM OF CREATION
Most of our
Universe is a freezing coldness because of the Hydrogen and Helium
that fills 99,9 % of the Universe.
Universal basis of Hydrogen and Helium is the very course to the
Background Radiation. It could be described as "The Omnipresence
which all heavier matter are being formed, torn apart and reformed
The rest 0,1 %
elements in our Universe are in a CONSTANTLY process of cluttering
and spreading because of constantly cosmic explosions which makes
the Molecular Gas- and Dust clouds to Whirl, Clutter, Melt and
Explode etc. etc.
Therefore: There are NO
beginning and there are NO end! There just are: In-folding and Out-folding
processes on every microcosmically and macrocosmically level.
When an cosmic expansion
happens, the expansive movement can only be braked universally again by
Molecular Gas- and Dust Clouds, Suns and Planets or other
explosive events in Cosmos. It is a Cosmic play of OPPOSITE
PRESSURES in a Basic Media of Hydrogen and Helium.
EXPLANATION ABOVE DEBUNKS SOME OF THE WORST "NATURAL LAWS":
There is NO linear cosmological movements!
movement in the Universe tells us of swirling matters and of things
exploding. Still the scientists are making linear equations! And of
course they will NEVER come to a linear understanding of something
bending or swirling!
Empty space does NOT exist!
When cosmologists looks at the dark
night Sky between the Stars and other heavenly bodies, they see
nothing. "Darkness" becomes almost an obsession in their scientific
minds for everything they don't see! Dark matter! Antimatter! Black
holes = "Nothing very strong and black"! My goodness! It does NOT
comply! There is no such thing as "empty space"! It is FULL of
Hydrogen and Helium! It is FULL of constant background vibrations! And of
clouds of Gas and Matter!
There is NO Universal time!
of time is very convenient in order to get up in the morning; catch
a bus etc. etc. But how does the time-concept comply to cosmically
movements that swirls and bends? The scientific time-concept is universal
nonsense! It does not even comply to the nearest Star and its True Solar Time! Time is
NOT a linear phenomenon and therefore it does NOT comply in
The Space/Time-hypothesis does NOT
Everything in Space is curving,
swirling, contracting and expanding! What kind of a clock is needed
to measure this kind of movement in the Universe? How can one make a
time schedule for curving, implosive and explosive movements in
Apace? The Space/Time equation does NOT
The Newton and Einstein Laws of
"Gravity" does NOT comply!
Scientists claims that The Universe
is expanding. But they have NO laws for this! Their basic law is
Contraction based on the false premises. How does a one-directed law
comply to a two-directed movement? It obvious does NOT!
The Big Bang Theory does NOT
Nothing can be created out of
Nothing! Minus times minus does NOT comply! The Big Bang theory is a
"double-minus-statement" and the theory gives a double amount of
questions than answers. The Big Bang hypothesis is really not any
better than the 4.000 year old biblical sudden statement: "Let there
be Light"! It does simply NOT comply as a logical and
The Universe is NOT just about 15
trillion years old!
Looking back on a special movement
in our Universe, the scientists tries to make us believe that one
can measure the bending Universe. They can't even measure the true Solar time
with a linear wristwatch!
By the way: Which cosmological implications are imbedded in the True Solar Time? Your time-concepts does NOT comply even the to the slightest subject
- And, when rejecting all the
bad scientific hypothesis and Equations, I of course have to rise a new relevant Equation
for a new and combined Holistic Cosmology, and here it is: (No
hypothesis is needed)
and beautiful, isn't it?
GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND MOVEMENTS OF CREATION
Everything is always moving between centralisation/contraction and
Lighter Elements of
Hydrogen and Helium. 99,9 % of the Universe. (The
Heavier Elements 0,1
% of the Universe in locally Molecular Clouds, Galaxies, Stars and
Hot and Cold (X degree
plus <–> minus 273 degree)
Expansion and Contraction.
Patter of movement 1:
Acceleration and Deceleration
Patter of movement
waves meets Gas and Dust matter and creates Swirls.
Patter of movement 3:
Right - and Left rotating Swirls
Patter of movement
Vertical Up- or
Downwards movements in Swirls.
Specifics of "Gravitation" (i.e:"Forces")
Interactive expansive forces with hot light and matter
and breaking fields of Gas and dust and "Pressing Shading Effects" between
Specifics of Universe:
Cold "empty space".
The space is NOT empty, but full of Hydrogen and Helium = "Frozen
Light" = "Dark matter".
Bar Galaxies = Outgoing force
Ordinary Galaxies = Ingoing force.
The Eye of the
Galaxy = Just like a Hurricane
Does NOT exist!
When "anti"-results are measured, it's just an "outside" force of
PRESSURE! (Explanations below)
THE CREATION OF
OUR SOLAR SYSTEM
Before the creation
of our Solar System, there was a cloud of molecular gas and dust. A
cosmic ray from a exploding Novae activated the cloud and created 2
swirls in the cloud. The 2 swirls began to clutter the gas and dust. The
amount of gas and dust in the 2 swirls was not equally heavy and
therefore the lightest swirl got ahead of the heavier cloud in the
So there was 2 major
processes in play before the Solar System was created and therefore we
actually have 2 different Systems: 1 System containing much Dust and
little Gas, and 1 System containing much Gas and little Dust. The first
became the Solar systems inner planets and the second was, in my
opinion, created about 1-2 million years before our inner Solar system, around Jupiter
(and Saturn?) which is indicated by the
many Moons around these 2 major Gas planets.
some dwarf planets of the Solar System; while the sizes are to scale,
the relative distances from the Sun are not. (From Wikipedia)
- Regarding the cluttering process in the 2 swirls, there are NOT any
"Newton gravitational" processes going on in the ordinary and dogmatic
understanding. It is simply the swirling effect from Novae waves
An outburst from a Quasar causing mushroom swirls
in the globular gas. (How can a supposedly Black Hole in a Quasar emits
anything out o the hole? Another Gravity anomaly!)
and compresses the gas and dust to such a degree, that it heats up,
melts and explodes out in 2 directions from the created magnetic poles
in the implosion. The cloud did NOT clutter "by it self" accordingly to
the totally misunderstood "Newton Law of Gravity concept" or the
Einstein theory of Relativity, which both basically is a cosmological
- The Sun has its own
magnetic sphere that changes and pulses in the Solar sphere, but beside
that, the Sun has NO gravitational effects, ordinarily understood. In
the contrary, the Solar Wind are PUSHING on the planets and this effect
reaches far out in the Solar System. And the same goes for all other
planets in our Solar System: They have NO
build-in-forces-that-contracts-anything-else-outside! It is a Newton
The Sun are
everything outwards until the outgoing force meets other extra Solar
opposite forces that BRAKES the the outgoing Solar Wind. And such an
opposite force is mainly coming from the centre of our Galaxy, the Milky
possibility is that our Solar System - and everything else in our
Galaxy - could have been created right out of the centre of the
Milky Way as astronomically observed by telescopes.
THE MILKY WAY
Just like the
original swirling creation of our Solar System, the Milky Way Galaxy
also was/is a swirl of gas and dust creation, which once was started of
by a major explosion from the surroundings of the molecular cloud, that
later on became the Milky Way Galaxy. And just like the forming of
swirls in the original Solar gas- and dust cloud, the very same once
was/is happening with the original Milky Way gas- and dust cloud.
But a Galaxy is not
"just an everyday Galaxy" with similar qualities and with similar movements. There are
younger and older Galaxies. There are left- and right turning Galaxies.
There are inwards- and outwards moving Galaxies.
And the inwards- or
outwards swirling direction depends on how long the swirling process
have been going on in an actual gas- and dust cloud.
And this again suggests
and indicates, that BOTH processes can go on in the same Galaxy
but then of course on the opposite vertical areas of the Galaxy.
That is: In-folding activity on one side and out-folding activity on
the opposite side at the same time. Just because of the swirling
effect, the melting process and the explosion process!
This photo shows a
Our own Milky Way
does not look like the Galaxy above, and it does not have the same
directional movement in the horizontal plane. The Galaxy above has
diffuse and smooth going arms with clouds of gas and dust moving INWARDS
towards the centre of the Galaxy. NOT accordingly to the "Newton Law of
Gravity" (Or Einstein's relative Relativity Laws) - but SIMPLY because
of the SWIRLING EFFECT that originally took place when the gas- and dust
cloud was hit by an external PUSHING or PRESSING forces that began to
swirl and compress the gas and dust.
Our Ancestors understood! A Galaxy
can have both white and black holes in the Spiral!
The process in this Galaxy above,
have not yet been that much compressed, but later on it will explode
more or less suddenly. (Or maybe there really are an out-folding process
on the opposite side of the Galaxy) Maybe it will be a very violent explosion or
maybe it slowly will turn out to be a Globular Cluster of Stars and
plasma, it all depends on many facts.
- Our Galaxy have
the opposite horizontal movement and it have come further in the
process compared to the Galaxy above, and therefore, our Galaxy is older and in
another process of cosmological growth.
Our Milky Way Galaxy
is a Bar-Galaxy. (Photo and X-ray photo).
The very immediate
look of our Galaxy tells us clearly, that the actual movement in our Galaxy is
going OUTWARDS. No inwards-going spiral arms in a Galaxy can abruptly
take a suddenly 90 degree turn! But they can if we are talking about an
When a galactic cloud
of gas and dust have been sufficient compressed by the swirling effect,
it melts, explodes and can be spread again in a suddenly burst outwards
from the 2 magnetic poles that was created in the melting stage. The 2
jets burst suddenly out while the movement of the original swirl is
continuing. The 2 major arms goes right out and leaves the outburst of
matter as tales, taking the shape of more and more spiral arms. And the
2 arms of suddenly outburst of matter forms the 2 characteristic Bars
from the centre of our Galaxy as clearly seen above.
THE SOLAR SYSTEM
AND MILKY WAY GALAXY
As mentioned above,
there is an outgoing force from our Sun PUSHING at everything in the
Solar System. But at the same time there also are an outgoing force from
the centre in our Milky Way Galaxy (as well as other extragalactic
forces pushing both at our galaxy and our Solar System) These combined
forces keeps the relative balance - so far - in the Solar system,
and normally it it no problem.
But the interaction
between these combined forces comes scientifically in to play especially
when spaceships leaves our Solar
system and begin to meet the extra Solar opposite directed power
movement, as described below with the
THE DEBUNKING SECTION:
When the horizontal
movement in the Milky Way clearly and surely is going OUTWARDS, there is
NO ACTUAL INWARDS forces. That is: "THE NEWTON LAW OF GRAVITY" DOES -
ALSO NOT - WORK HERE! And when there is no inwards going forces in our
Milky Way, there is NO little strong mysterious dwarf, called "Black Hole", sitting
in the Milky Way centre PULLING at anything.
And the same goes for
the inwards directed Galaxies: The presumed "Pulling Dwarf in the
centre" is reduced to nothing, because the inwards force is just a
simple result of an Nova explosion in the neighbourhood causing heated swirls
in the molecular gas- and dust cloud.
CONTRADICTIONS AND ANOMALIES
Outwards or Inwards?
In February 2008 some
Astrophysicists and Cosmologists announced that "the centre in our
Galaxy is a colossal particle generator with a massive radiation of
forces that effects Gas- and Dust clouds in the surroundings".
But how? How can the
scientists at the SAME TIME keep working with the "Newton Law of
Gravity" that pulls everything inwards in a "Black Hole", and at the same time announce
"a massive out-radiating force" in the very centre that accordingly to the
already accepted laws, should be PULLING at everything?
The movement in our
Galaxy can NOT go both ways in the same time! This just shows how
cosmological scientists time after time contradicts themselves caused by
centuries of mental acceptance of the Newton Hoax.
Black Hole ripping
atoms or assembling atoms?
In August 2008
some scientists announced that they have solved the mystery of young
Suns formed close to the Milky Way centre "Black Hole". The
scientists had made a computer simulation of a molecular cloud
"falling in to a Black
Hole" and thereby they stated that the simulation had confirmed how the
young Suns was formed.
Again "the Newton
century confusion" comes in to play: Does a "Black Hole" rips everything
apart? Or does it build "New Suns"? How on Earth can they work with 1
(misunderstood) "Law of Gravity" that gives 2 contra dictionary results!
Either everything are ripped apart in a "Black Hole" accordingly to the
Newton Hoax Gravity, or everything in the centre of our Galaxy is being
build up and on its way out of our Galaxy! It can NOT be both ways at
the same time!
And what is the
benefit of using misunderstood "Natural Laws" programmed in a computer
that just spit out the result you are hoping and asking for? The only
benefit is that the scientists are promoting them selves on behalf of
true natural science.
COMPARING "BELOW AS
What else is a Galaxy
but a a giant parallel to an earthly Hurricane? Is "everything above not
just as below"? Well, it really should be!
Simply because the creative
forces ON Earth is a result from the original creative forces in our
Galaxy and so on!
What if the centre in
our Galaxy not contains anything else but the same hole in a Hurricane?
Are "a black hole" then just black because the background of the hole is
black as the hole in a Hurricane is blue because the Sky above the Earth
There is NO little
strong dwarf sitting in the Hurricane centre pulling at anything! It is
just a hole! But on the inside swirling there is strong forces going on!
And the movement of a Hurricane is either clockwise or anticlockwise.
Either inwards directed or outwards directed. Either upwards or
downwards directed. Or simply: Similar principal weather system
movements as in Galaxies!
It is just "Above
like Below": This picture of an Earthly Weather system forming swirls or
whirls indicates very clearly what also is going on everywhere else in
FURTHER EXAMPLES OF "GRAVITY"
IDIOSYNCRASIES AND ANOMALIE
THE BIG BANG NONSENSE
Oh, dear! I am very sorry
to be told by modern cosmologists that Nothingness ruled before the Universe
and our Galaxy was created.
And the latest modern cosmological theory goes on that the created Universe
again will disappear into that Nothingness from where it not was created
before Big Bang, according to another Theory. Confused?
- I don't
believe in the "Big Bang" theory! The theory is basically no logical and it
is a cosmological nonsense with many contra-dictionary implements.
Surely there must have been something before the was
ever started with a "Big Bang" and nothing will ever end with a "Big
Crunch". But EVERYTHING is in a eternal movement between contraction
and expansion. It's simply a Natural Law.
Surely there must have been Something before
"a big bang" that Created our Universe and our Galaxy!? How can modern cosmological scientists claim and maintain such
an idiosyncrasy which really is no better cosmological explanation than in
the Biblical statement: "Let there be light"!? And what kind
of an cosmological and scientific explanation is such a statement? None!
I know how: Because the
scientists mainly are using the intellectual side of their brain and because
they have lost the connection to Mother Nature that could have given the
scientists the natural wisdom which mirrors all matters "in the Sky as
well on the Earth".
"Stars are born of cosmic clouds of dust (Nebulas) in the Galaxies as
seen on the picture below with the Eagle Nebulae.
Scientific quotation: "The cloud contains
mainly of Hydrogen and dust in extreme coldness around 260 degree below
the Celsius freezing point, which lowest degree are minus 273 Celsius.
On a certain point of time, the cloud contents of atoms, molecules and
dust begins to clot together and form still larger clots. Accordingly to
this cluttering, the Gravity is increasingly accelerated, whereby
the cloud contracts so violently that it shatters in minor parts which
later on can be formed as Stars", end of quotation.
Everything very well explained -
except from the
Gravity part of the explanation which the
Cosmologists and Astrophysics totally have misunderstood all back since
the Newton Gravity Law was launched. The ordinary understanding of
"gravity" is a major hoax and an illusion! Except from a minor
local planetary magnetism, nothing PULLS at anything else.
From the scientific quotation above: "On
a certain point of time, the cloud contents of atoms, molecules and dust
begins to clot together . . ."!? What illusive power makes the elements
to BEGIN to clot together in the first place?
Does the ordinary Law of Gravity contains "a suddenly contractional
quality force" that SUDDENLY can switch off and on? That is pure cosmological
nonsense! The power that makes
the cloud contents of atoms, molecules
and dust to clutter must CERTAINLY have been switched ON the whole time!
And so it is!
The Cosmological principles of Expansion and
Contraction which everyone can observe everywhere in Micro Cosmos as well in
this Universal fact very clearly, I also hurry with this addition:
In smaller connections and on smaller cosmological scales there is
also solar forces and electromagnetic waves that directly PUSHES on
planets and so on. But there is NO forces that pulls in one another.
The observation of such a connection is simply a SEEMINGLY effect
caused by a "shadowing situation" between objects.
AND DISCREPANCIES (WIKIPEDIA)
There are some observations that are not adequately accounted for,
which may point to the need for better theories of gravity or
perhaps be explained in other ways. (You can say that
Stars on the outskirts of galaxies are
moving faster than they should. Also galaxies within galaxy
clusters are moving faster than they should.
both been proposed as explanations.
accordingly to the Newton Hoax Law, yes. But NOT accordingly to my
expansion of the universe
seems to be speeding up.
has been proposed to explain this. A recent alternative
explanation is that the geometry of space is not homogeneous
(due to clusters of galaxies) and that when the data is
reinterpreted to take this into account, the expansion is not
speeding up after all. (Just read above:
When an expansion reaches far enough out, it will be braked by other
The Pioneer spacecraft seem to be slowing
down in a way which has yet to be explained.
(Just read below!)
Various spacecraft have experienced
greater accelerations during slingshot manoeuvres than expected.
(Because they are under influence of the
Solar Wind directed out going power and under the influence of the
same outgoing forces form our Galaxy - AND they are under influence
of the COMBINED forces from the Sun and our Galaxy some times more
and sometime less, all depending in which direction the crafts are
moving compared to the Sun and to the direction in the centre of our
effect has been measured by
and others which exceeds that predicted by General Relativity by
many orders of magnitude.
(It just clearly
shows that neither the Newton Law of Gravity or the Relativity Law
of Einstein can explain the most simple an natural cosmological
movement and therefore should be rejected and abandoned as soon as
ANDROMEDA GALAXY ANOMALY
Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope have identified the source of a
mysterious blue light surrounding a supermassive black hole in our neighboring
Andromeda Galaxy (M31). Though the light has puzzled astronomers for more than a
decade, the new discovery makes the story even more mysterious.
The blue light is coming from a disk of hot, young stars. These stars are
whipping around the black hole in much the same way as planets in our solar
system are revolving around the Sun. Astronomers are perplexed about how the
pancake-shaped disk of stars could form so close to a giant black hole. In such
a hostile environment, the black hole's tidal forces should tear matter apart,
making it difficult for gas and dust to collapse and form stars.
Clearly, the scientist again
gets it all wrong because of "the Newton Gravity hoax" which are
embedded or cemented in their brains. The forming of NEW Stars in the
centre of the Andromeda Galaxy clearly indicates and OUT-GOING-EXPANSION
and NOT AN IN-GOING-CONTRACTION!
Or an even further more worse
scientific cosmic scenario: And in-going force on the one side of the
Galaxy - and an out-going force on the other side of the Galaxy. Just as
the movement in a Hurricane! How does the "Newton and Einstein law of
gravity" comply and compute to such a movement?
THE ANCIENT STORY OF
CREATION IN THE MILKY WAY
Picture 1 is a
star atlas picture of the southern Milky Way contours with an inserted
celestial pole and an animated swirl, representing the centre of our
Galaxy. Picture 2 from Egypt shows the Mother Goddess in the Sky. Out
from her womb rays of matter floats and gives shape to all matter in our
her head a circle is placed in much the same spot as in the star map
picture. How did our ancestors get to know such cosmological facts?
In the Norse Mythology the story of Creation begins with a
Ginnungagap, which contains
the hole universe. In the northern part, Niflheim, there is coldness and
moisture. In south, Muspelheim is warm and glowing. From Muspelheim hot sparks
flew out and mingled with the cold and moist then creating the Heavenly Cow
which nursed the first giant,
Myths of Creation
Norse and many other mythological storytelling we directly can learn, that
life in cosmos is created when warm matter meets cold matter. When warm and cold macrocosmic matter
meets, big swirls is formed, just like we know
from modern astronomical observations of galaxies. And just like we can se
from hurricanes, many Galaxies also have holes in the centre just like
"twisters" have. "As above, so it also is down below".
What you can
observe in small scale on the Earth, you also can observe in big scale in
the Sky. In my opinion it is not necessary to send expensive tin-cans out
in the Universe in order to understand cosmos.
ONE WAY TRACK OF MODERN COSMOLOGY.
Compared with the Mythic
way of understanding Cosmos, the modern way is an one way track science in the
sense that the scientists mainly
are using one side of their brains. In order to complete a whole picture
and a whole knowledge, you have to look at everything from at least 2
sides. The one-way-track-mind creates strange theories which very often is
directly contradictory and the track prevents the scientists to really
understand simple cosmological facts.
NEWTON "LAW OF GRAVITY"
The day Newton had
nothing else to do but laying under an apple tree, he just should have
eaten the falling apple in stead of making brain spin out of the event. That
had prevented much of that false knowledge which later on was cemented in the
brains of coming cosmological scientists.
Imagine that the Newton
apple tree have been so tall that its treetop was placed in the so called
"no gravity space" out from the Earth. Then the apple never had
fallen to the ground of Earth! But Newton
just stated that the Earth is pulling on the apple!
a BBC documentary on Comets it is now stated, that Newton did NOT make
his Law of Gravity by watching an apple falling, but by watching a comet
orbiting the Sun. Well, then Newton should have given it a closer look
and asked himself why the Comet tale was pressed out and away from
the Sun! Clearly, the Newton law of Gravity is basically a fake! And in
the same documentary it is also stated that our Sun produce waves of
PRESSURE and that other stars influences on our Solar System by their
picture of a Comet passing around the Sun, illustrates clearly the outgoing
pressure force from the Sun. The picture shows the opposite of the Newton
Gravity Theory with the Comet tale radiating AWAY from the Sun in stead of
the Comet being PULLED towards the Sun. There is NO pull!
ONE MIND TRACK NEWTON GRAVITY CONFUSION.
that the Moon is slowly moving
further AWAY from the Earth does not confirm Newton's pulling effect, does
it? No, another explanation is necessary in order to
understand what is going on.
strong force is able to pull at anything at the same time on the Earth
from a central position inside the Earth? It does not seems logical,
does it? The longer one moves toward the centre of the Earth, the
smaller is the mass which can pull at you! And if you imagine yourself
being in the atomic centre of the Earth, there is no more any matter
which can pull at anything! The "Newton Law of Gravity " is gaga!
course I do not claim that gravity does not exist. I just claim that
Gravity is not an effect of pulling forces. At the contrary, Gravity is
an effect of combined PUSHING COSMIC FORCES and cosmic movements of the
celestial bodies. Such as the Earth rotation, the Solar Wind, the
gravity waves in our Galaxy, the shading effect from the Moon on both
the Solar wind and on the Galaxy and extragalactic gravity forces.
The planets does NOT PULL
at one another! It is NOT the Earth gravitation which PULL us down to the
ground! In fact, there is really even no cosmological DOWN or UP!
REAL LAW OF GRAVITY IS A "LAW OF VARIABLE PRESSURE"
From our Weather forecast
we are familiar with expressions as High- and Low pressure. These terminologies
is more precise in order to describe the forces which
hold us down on the Earth and other matters concerning micro- and
creates a outgoing force which is pressing on all the Planets and further
out in space. From the centre of our Galaxy there is another outgoing
force which also is pressing on the Solar-System. In general, and
it is these 2 forces that holds the Planets in movement and in relative
balance in the Solar system. "Gravity" is just 2 opposite forces in this
modern cosmological knowledge from 11/23.2004 shows the outgoing force from
the Sun meeting the outgoing force from the Galaxy.
(Stjernevind/Galaksevind) This picture confirmed my intuitive understanding
of gravitational forces in our Solar system and in our Galaxy.
Solar- and Galaxy pressure on every person on Earth is approximately
2 pounds pr. square-centimetre. This pressure is of course not constant as
with everything else in the Universe. The pressure varies with the rhythm of the
Sun, the Moon and with the actual outgoing Galaxy force.
Imagine the outgoing force
from the Sun creating a pressure on the Earth. This pressure creates in its
own a delayed tide wave around the Earth. When the Moon is positioned between
the Earth and the Sun, the pressure will be lesser because the Moon "shades"
for the pressure on the Earth.
It is first of all the
pressure from the Sun together with the revolving Earth that create the
round shape of the Earth and other Planets.
picture of a Comet passing around the Sun, illustrates clearly the outgoing
pressure force from the Sun. The picture shows the opposite of the Newton
Gravity Theory with the Comet tale radiating AWAY from the Sun in stead of
the Comet being PULLED towards the Sun.
Clearly the Sun is NOT
PULLING but PRESSING. And if some planet is positioned between the Sun and
another planet this Pressure will be "SHADED" with the result of
some lesser pressure on the shaded planet.
And how can one
explain the fact that the Moon is moving AWAY from the Earth by 3,8
centimetre every year if the 2 heavenly bodies is pulling at one another
with enormous forces? It does not make sense!
SCIENTIFIC LINEAR TIME-CONCEPT BLOCAGE
small people on the Earth operates with a very small time-concept which conveniently
is connected to the cycle of day and night. But transferring these rules
from this small time concept on to macrocosmic matters, we will fail to
understand the real matter. The Earthly time concept is Linear and it doesn't
work beyond the borders of the Earth. And it even really doesn't work
accordingly to the True solar Time!
Strange enough, cosmological scientists observes lots and lots of
Galaxies which are moving and seem to infolding an out folding matter - but anyway the scientists
still operates with the excludingly linear time concept on the clearly
in-folding and out- folding Space. Therefore: "Time" can NOT be
connected to Space" The Time/Space concept does NOT work!
The Universe is full of
revolving, bending, folding and swirling matters in space". When these matters behave in a
non-linear way, we have to change our linear time concept in order to understand the
behaviour of these movements.
NOTHING in the
Universe moves in linear patterns! So why is it that cosmological
scientists is working with linear theories?
MASSES AND BLACK HOLES.
Observing many Galaxies, the
Astronomers often find a so called "black hole" in the middle of a
Galaxy as seen on the 2 pictures above. But picture 1 does not show a
It shows a satellite photo of a Hurricane. In the eye of a hurricane there is
nothing physically to observe. Most of the modern cosmological scientists
can not or will not se the resemblance between "up there" and
What modern scientists can
not se or weigh, it claims something not existing. The hole in a Galaxy then describes
then as a
"nothingness" which anyway contains a great power, "antimatter".
Looking at the beginning of
a Thunderstorm when cold matter meets warm matter, it builds up, folds out,
and begins to swirl. The powerful swirling creates the hole in the
hurricane and the swirling matter becomes charged around the hole, which
have no power in it self.
There is no matter or antimatter in the hole. It
is empty for matter but full of power around the hole. A power which can be
downwards- or upwards directed and at the same time folding in or out of
itself until the hurricane dissolves.
Our ancestors have many
symbols which shows macro- and micro cosmological phenomenon's. For instance
the Anglo-Saxon picture to the left above, which shows even the minor swirls
around the major hole of a hurricane. The 2 Asiatic swastika symbols to the
right shows a left- and a right turning swirl, just like the low-pressure and
high-pressure hurricanes and weather systems.
A TRIBUTE TO OUR
The very idea of
"swirling patterns" are not new. I'm sure our ancestors had a much
greater purpose making swirls in stones and other materials than
"just for fun". And I'm even sure they had some spiritual visions of
the creative forces in Cosmos. I mean, as I myself was able to have
such spiritual Visions some years ago in the middle of the modern
hurly burly, what could our ancestors then spiritually have achieved
in the quiet Nature?
The entrance of
the Ritual Megalithic Newgrange, Ireland
on Viking Stone. Bro, Sweden
on a Bronze Age Shield, Denmark
My posts for Mythology, Religion and
Joseph Campbell Forum: